<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Weekly Photograph - Shadow</title>
	<link>http://www.somerandomdude.net/blog/photograph-of-the-week/weekly-photograph-shadow/</link>
	<description>Your basic design blog.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 21:10:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Wild Guess</title>
		<link>http://www.somerandomdude.net/blog/photograph-of-the-week/weekly-photograph-shadow/#comment-18840</link>
		<author>Wild Guess</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2007 08:16:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.somerandomdude.net/blog/photograph-of-the-week/weekly-photograph-shadow/#comment-18840</guid>
		<description>Was this photo taken with your digi-cam with the red lens filter thingy?

It is a good picture.  I am wondering what it would look like if you cropped it in a way where only the shadows and the sidewalk were visible.  Nothing else.  No other subjects.  Just the shadow of the man and the buildings.  

The shadow is quite striking and deep.  Very contrasty to the brick sidewalk that is absorbing a lot of light.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Was this photo taken with your digi-cam with the red lens filter thingy?</p>
<p>It is a good picture.  I am wondering what it would look like if you cropped it in a way where only the shadows and the sidewalk were visible.  Nothing else.  No other subjects.  Just the shadow of the man and the buildings.  </p>
<p>The shadow is quite striking and deep.  Very contrasty to the brick sidewalk that is absorbing a lot of light.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
